A concept that I found interesting in Chapter 2 was the
topic on Cohesion. I found this interesting because our prior discussions
focused on interdependence and interrelationships which are two completely
opposite concepts. Group cohesion is explained in the text as the act of one
individual in a particular group that has an attraction to the group that
ultimately helps the group as a whole. Cohesion exists in those who have the
urge and commitment to be loyal to their group in order to reach a goal that
they all share. There is a strong willingness to help amongst one another,
which is unapparent in an interdependent group. Because the act of cohesion is positive,
any group who share this concept are often more effective and more satisfied in
the outcome due to their better decision making skills and communication.
Another interesting fact I learned about Cohesion was the terminology they use
with one another. Group cohesions often use terms such as “we” to refer
themselves as a whole rather than using the words I, me, or him/her. Other
groups that are not their own are referred to as “they”. Cohesion groups are
very communicative and less stressful than other groups that focus on
themselves or don’t share the same passion/goals with the other individuals.
The concept of cohesion rose a particular interest as I wish to share this type
of group communication in upcoming endeavors with group work.
Hi Hope!
ReplyDeleteI also found cohesion to be an interesting topic from the book. I did not realize the relation of interdependence and interrelationships to cohesion, until I read it on your blog. It was also very interesting that you found the regular pronouns used by group cohesions. It conveys the fact that loyal individuals in the group are able to show their devotion through the use of words, not only actions. Cohesion groups work great when dealing with issues that involve the loyalty of each member in the group, like political groups. Your blog made me think about groups outside of the usual small groups that are listed in the book. Interesting blog!
Hi Hope,
ReplyDeleteI like your observation about the use of the words "we" versus "they" in cohesive and non-cohesive groups. The use of the word "we" really shows unity among group members, which is always a good sign. Working in a less cohesive group with people that are less committed to the group's task can certainly make it harder to have success because more stress is out on those that want to achieve the group's goal. I agree that loyalty among group members creates an environment that is more focused and efficient because each person is accountable and wants to help each other out.